Legal Pluralism in Kalimantan: A Study of the Dual Application of Criminal Law and Customary Law in Dayak Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i7.257Keywords:
Legal Pluralism, Dayak Customary Law, Criminal Law, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This research examines legal pluralism in Kalimantan through the dual application of formal criminal law (KUHP) and Dayak customary law in the resolution of criminal cases. Case studies include murder in Kutai Barat (2021), Mempawah Hulu (2018), and theft in Sengah Temila (2018). A qualitative approach was used with document analysis and case reports. Results show that customary mechanisms such as fines and ‘pati nya’ rituals are effective in restoring social harmony, but have the potential to conflict with the formal legal system. This research recommends the integration of customary law into the national legal system, in accordance with Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution and Permendagri No. 52/2014.
References
1945 Constitution.
Arief, B. N. (2018). Harmonizing customary and formal law in Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 3(2), 45–60.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. (2017). Legal pluralism in postcolonial contexts: Lessons from Indonesia. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49(3), 301–320.
Braithwaite, J. (2017). Restorative justice and reintegrative shaming in modern societies. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(4), 1023–1040.
Criminal Code (KUHP).
Damianus, S. Th. (2019). Customary law of Dayak Kanayatn in murder cases in Mempawah Hulu. PSMH UNTAN Journal, 15(4), 123–140.
Denny Satria. (2015). Application of Dayak Kanayatn customary law in criminal cases in Landak Regency. PSMH UNTAN Journal, 9(3), 89–105.
Griffiths, J. (2016). Revisiting legal pluralism: New challenges in globalized societies. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 48(1), 1–20.
Juwana, H. (2020). Integrating customary law into Indonesia’s legal system. Jakarta Law Review, 5(1), 33–50.
L. Efendi, et al. (2020). Recognition of customary court decisions in West Kutai. Journal of Legal Reform, 3(1), 15–30.
Law Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights.
Lukito, R. (2019). Legal pluralism in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 16(3), 200–215.
Moore, S. F. (2018). Semi-autonomous social fields in modern legal systems. Law & Society Review, 52(4), 900–920.
Pramusinto, A. (2021). Public policy and indigenous rights in Indonesia. Gadjah Mada Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 25–40.
Rahardjo, S. (2016). Law and society in pluralistic Indonesia. Angkasa Law Journal, 2(2), 67–80.
Rawls, J. (2021). Justice as fairness in pluralistic societies. Harvard Law Review, 134(6), 1800–1825.
Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 52 of 2014.
Santoso, T. (2021). Restorative justice in Indonesian customary law: A case study of Dayak communities. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 5(1), 50–65.
Sen, A. (2019). Justice and capability in indigenous communities. Journal of Global Ethics, 15(3), 250–265.
SIPP PN Ngabang, 100/Pid.B/2018/PN NBA.
SIPP PN Ngabang, 97/Pid.B/2018/PN NBA.
SIPP West Kutai District Court, 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Sdw.
Susanti, A. (2020). Dayak customary law and restorative justice in Kalimantan. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 88–102.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2018). Legal pluralism and harmonization: Global perspectives. Sydney Law Review, 40(3), 350–370.
Van Ness, D. W. (2020). Restorative justice in criminal law systems. International Journal of Restorative Justice, 3(1), 45–60.
Zehr, H. (2015). Changing lenses: Restorative justice for our times. Herald Press Journal, 25(2), 100–115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 A. Imam Al Muttaqin, Adriyanto Adriyanto, M. Bashori, Marsudi Dedi Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
