Biodiversity Accounting Research Mapping: Bibliometric Analysis to Identify Thematic Trends and Research Gaps

Medina Almunawwaroh; Rina Marliana; Rikah Rikah

doi:10.55927/eajmr.v4i10.417

Authors

Medina Almunawwaroh Universitas Siliwangi
Rina Marliana Universitas Siliwangi
Rikah Rikah Universitas YPPI Rembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i10.417

Keywords:

Bibliometric Analysis, Biodiversity Accounting, Corporate Disclosure, Sustainability Reporting, Research Mapping

Abstract

Biodiversity accounting research has accelerated significantly since 2020, but comprehensive mapping of the intellectual structure of this field is still limited. This research aims to map the intellectual landscape, thematic evolution, and collaboration patterns in biodiversity accounting research. Bibliometric analysis was conducted on 102 documents from Scopus for the period 2013-2025 using VOSviewer. The results of the study identified three main thematic clusters: corporate disclosure practices, theoretical-methodological foundations, and ecosystem services-ecology perspectives. Temporal evolution shows a shift from conceptual development to practical application. The dominance of developed countries in knowledge production indicates geographical inequalities that require more inclusive international collaboration. This research provides a roadmap for the development of future biodiversity accounting research.

References

Adams, C. A. (2020). Sustainable development reporting: The reporting framework. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. Del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_83-1

Adams, C. A., & Abhayawansa, S. (2022). Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, and calls for 'harmonisation' of sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, Article 102309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102309

Adler, R., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top Fortune Global companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(3), 787–825. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2490

Adler, R., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2023). Biodiversity and threatened species reporting by the top Fortune Global companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 360–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2021-5136

Atkins, J., & Maroun, W. (2018). Integrated extinction accounting and accountability: Building an ark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(3), 750–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2957

Atkins, J., Atkins, B. C., Thomson, I., & Maroun, W. (2015). "Good" news from nowhere: Imagining utopian sustainable accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1485

Atkins, J., Doni, F., & Gasperini, A. (2024). Examining corporate biodiversity disclosure: A phase model approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(1), 233–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2022-5744

Atkins, J., Maroun, W., Atkins, B. C., & Barone, E. (2018). From the Big Five to the Big Four? Exploring extinction accounting for the rhinoceros. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(2), 674–702. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2320

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

Boiral, O. (2016). Accounting for the unaccountable: Biodiversity reporting and impression management. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 751–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2497-9

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1

Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5), e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253

Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., & Man, X. (2015). State of the art on food waste research: A bibliometric study from 1997 to 2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 840-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.085

Conservation International. (2023). Megadiverse countries. https://www.conservation.org/priorities/biodiversity-hotspots

Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

Cuckston, T. (2018). Making extinction calculable. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(3), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2015-2264

Dasgupta, P. (2021). The economics of biodiversity: The Dasgupta review. HM Treasury. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/final-report-the-economics-of-biodiversity-the-dasgupta-review

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

European Commission. (2023). Corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD). https://finance.ec.europa.eu/capital-markets-union-and-financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting_en

Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (2019). Some reflections on the construct of emancipatory accounting: Shifting meaning and the possibilities of a new pragmatism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 63, Article 101975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.01.004

Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006

Gray, R., Adams, C. A., & Owen, D. (2014). Accountability, social responsibility, and sustainability: Accounting for society and the environment. Pearson Education.

GRI. (2016). GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016. Global Reporting Initiative. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/gri-standards-download-center/gri-304-biodiversity-2016/

Haque, F., & Jones, M. J. (2020). European firms' corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), Article 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100893

Haque, S., & Jones, M. J. (2020). European companies' biodiversity reporting: A survey. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(2), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2018-3443

Houdet, J., Trommetter, M., & Weber, J. (2012). Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 73, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.013

IIRC. (2021). The international framework. International Integrated Reporting Council. https://www.integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/

IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H. T. Ngo, Eds.). IPBES Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Jones, M. J. (2003). Accounting for biodiversity: Operationalising environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(5), 762–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310505961

Jones, M. J., & Solomon, J. F. (2013). Problematising accounting for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 668–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1255

Lamberton, G. (2005). Sustainability accounting—A brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum, 29(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.11.001

Mansoor, H., & Maroun, W. (2016). An initial review of biodiversity reporting by South African corporates: The case of the food and mining sectors. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 19(4), 592–614. https://doi.org/10.17159/2222-3436/2016/v19n4a9

Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2018). The emancipatory potential of extinction accounting: Exploring current practice in integrated reports. Accounting Forum, 42(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.12.001

Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2020). The transformative potential of extinction accounting and accountability: Implications for policy-makers and professional accounting bodies. In J. Atkins & B. Atkins (Eds.), The business of bees: An integrated approach to bee decline and corporate responsibility (pp. 213–230). Routledge.

Maroun, W., & Usher, E. (2018). A critical evaluation of corporate biodiversity reporting in South Africa. In Sustainability accounting and integrated reporting (pp. 155–177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108032-9

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf

Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R., & Mittermeier, C. G. (1997). Megadiversity: Earth's biologically wealthiest nations. Conservation International.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

Natural Capital Coalition. (2016). Natural capital protocol. https://capitalscoalition.org/capitals-approach/natural-capital-protocol/

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today's academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Rimmel, G., & Jonäll, K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: Corporate disclosure and preparers' views. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 746–778. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1228

Roberts, L., Brower, J., & Kerr, J. (2021). A new wave of ecological accounting? The reporting of nature reserves by local governments. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2019-4130

Russell, S., Milne, M. J., & Dey, C. (2022). Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts: Critical reflections on environmental accounting and propositions for ecologically informed accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(7), 1426–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010

Samkin, G., Schneider, A., & Tappin, D. (2014). Developing a reporting and evaluation framework for biodiversity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(3), 527–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1496

Scopus. (2025). Scopus database. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com [on September 2, 2025]

Siddiqui, J. (2013). Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: Potential implications for a developing economy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 779–805. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1242

TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. http://www.teebweb.org/

TNFD. (2023). Recommendations of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures. https://tnfd.global/

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Liempd, D., & Busch, J. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Denmark. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(5), 833–872. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1232

WBCSD. (2011). Guide to corporate ecosystem valuation: A framework for improving corporate decision-making. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. https://www.wbcsd.org/

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629