Integration of CSR and ESG into Corporate Strategies in Realizing Social-Environmental Accountability: Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Shely Dinar Thamara Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Nurita Andriani Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Muhammad Syarif Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i11.461

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Corporate Accountability

Abstract

This research aims to map the integration of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) in modern corporate strategies and their implications for social and environmental accountability. CSR, which was originally understood as a philanthropic activity, is now transformed into a corporate value framework and purpose, while ESG is developing as a data-driven measurement, audit, and reporting tool for the benefit of investors, regulators, and capital markets. The results of the analysis show that the harmonization of post-2020 global standards—such as ISSB, CSRD, and TCFD—makes ESG not just a voluntary instrument, but part of mandatory disclosure that links sustainability with financial risk mitigation. Thus, the successful integration of the two requires strengthening regulations, data verification, and effective governance in order to be able to create real and sustainable socio-environmental impacts, not just reputational legitimacy.

References

Aluchna, M., & Roszkowska-Menkes, M. (2019). Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate governance at the company level: Towards a conceptual model. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 30(3), 349–361.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of ESG on financial performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 60, 191–205.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

CFA Institute. (2023). ESG standards handbook. CFA Institute.

Comoli, M., Tettamanzi, P., & Murgolo, M. (2023). Accounting for ‘ESG’ under disruptions: A systematic literature network analysis. Sustainability, 15(6633).

Dempere, J., Alamash, E., & Mattos, P. (2024). Unveiling the truth: Greenwashing in sustainable finance. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5(1362051).

Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, May–June.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.

IFRS Foundation. (2021). Sustainability reporting and the ISSB. IFRS.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2022). Corporate sustainability: A strategy? Management Science, 68(7), 4802–4825.

Jámbor, A., & Zanócz, A. (2023). The diversity of environmental, social, and governance aspects in sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(13958).

Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG integration in investment management: Myth and reality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 48–55.

Kushwaha, J. K., Ghosh, A., Mishra, A. K., & Giri, O. P. (2025). Collaborative and reciprocal influences across bank and customer synergistic sustainability: Developing a framework for sustainable business viability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(5), 1933–1942.

Passas, I. (2024). The evolution of ESG: From CSR to ESG 2.0. Encyclopedia, 4, 1711–1720.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

PRI. (2006). Principles for Responsible Investment. United Nations.

Taylor, M. B. (2021). Counter corporate litigation: Remedy, regulation, and repression in the struggle for a just transition. Sustainability, 13(10742).

Zervoudi, E. K., Moschos, N., & Christopoulos, A. G. (2025). From the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria to the greenwashing phenomenon. Sustainability, 17(2222).

Zhu, Q., Smith, J. M., Martini, L., McClelland, C., Battalora, L., Rulifson, G., Kleine, M. S., West, S., & Lucena, J. (2021). CSR and engineering education. ETHICS-2021 Special Session.

Published

2025-11-25