Epistemology in the Algorithmic Era: A Critique of Digital Rationality through the Lens of Post-Positivism, Critical Theory, and Constructivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i11.493Keywords:
Algorithmic Epistemology, Digital Rationality, Post-Positivism, Critical Theory, ConstructivismAbstract
This article analyzes the formation of epistemology in the algorithmic era through the perspectives of post-positivism, critical theory, and constructivism. Employing a qualitative approach based on literature study and interpretive–critical analysis, this research explores how algorithms shape digital rationality and claims of technological objectivity in the production of knowledge. The findings indicate that algorithms do not merely represent reality, but actively construct it through mechanisms of datafication, classification, and prediction. Post-positivism reveals the tentative and biased nature of digital knowledge; critical theory uncovers the power structures and politico-economic interests embedded in the operation of algorithms; while constructivism highlights that algorithmic objectivity is a socially constructed notion legitimized through technocratic discourse. This article underscores the importance of critical and interdisciplinary understanding of digital epistemology in contemporary society.
References
Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1944)
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31
Beer, D. (2019). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. SAGE Publications.
Beer, D. (2023). The Data Gaze: Capitalism, Power and Perception. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716628
Bentley, T. (2024). Post-positivist inquiry in the digital age: Rethinking objectivity in algorithmic systems. SAGE Publications.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books. (Original work published 1966)
Berry, D. M. (2025). The philosophy of the algorithmic condition. Oxford University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened common sense: The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2020). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dixon-Woods, M., Cavers, D., Agarwal, S., Annandale, E., Arthur, A., Harvey, J., Hsu, R., Katbamna, S., Olsen, R., Smith, L., Riley, R., & Sutton, A. J. (2006). Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6(35). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-35
Floridi, L. (2022). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, C. (2022). Digital capitalism: Society and the digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003152701
Gillespie, T. (2020). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300189470.001.0001
Gritsenko, D. (2022). Algorithmic governance in digital society: Power, legitimacy, and the politics of automation. Big Data & Society, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221083356
Hyzen, A. (2025). Epistemic welfare and algorithmic recommendation: Toward a normative epistemology of platforms. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2024-0012
Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Discrimination in the age of algorithms. Journal of Legal Analysis, 10(2), 113–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laz001
Maalsen, S. (2023). Datafication and digital knowledge production: Rethinking epistemic assumptions in urban analytics. Environment and Planning B, 50(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211065089
Neuberger, C. (2023). The structural transformation of the digital public sphere: Algorithms, platforms, and the logic of attention. Digital Journalism, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2079203
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing.
Ovalle, A., Ekdale, B., & Tully, M. (2023). Data surveillance and media power in digital societies. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1332–1351. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221084599
Rakova, B., & Dobbe, R. (2023). Environmental datafication and the epistemology of ecological algorithms. Environmental Science & Policy, 146, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.011
Serafini, P. (2023). Platforms, epistemology, and the architecture of online knowledge. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2334–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221098765
Shin, D. (2025). Algorithmic truth-making: Epistemology of intelligent systems. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24830
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Yeung, K. (2022). Algorithmic regulation and knowledge formation. Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00493-7
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salsabila Citra Devi, Agung Winarno, Subagyo Subagyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



























